Somewhere out there is a job posting that describes you perfectly: every skill, every year, every nice-to-have. It does not exist — and the person who got hired didn't match it either.
That requirements list is a wishlist, not a contract
Hiring managers write job postings the way you'd describe your dream apartment: huge kitchen, near transit, exposed brick, in budget. Then they tour real places and rank what actually matters. A posting with twelve bullet points is rarely twelve hard rules — it's a wishlist someone brainstormed in twenty minutes, hoping a unicorn applies. They do not expect a unicorn. They expect a strong human who covers the parts that count.
So your job isn't to match every line. It's to figure out which lines are load-bearing — the core requirements — and whether you clear those.
How to find the "core" requirements
Read the posting twice. The first pass feels intimidating. On the second pass, sort every bullet into one of three buckets:
- Core (the job is this): the 2–4 skills the role literally cannot run without. Usually near the top, often repeated in the responsibilities section too.
- Nice-to-have: the "bonus," "an asset," "familiarity with," "preferred" lines. Translation: we'd be delighted, but we'll train.
- Wish-casting: the random tool or certification someone added because the last hire happened to have it. Safe to ignore if the core is solid.
Watch the verbs. "Must have" and "required" are core. "Familiarity with," "exposure to," "a plus" are soft. The language tells you which is which if you let it.
"7 requirements, I only fully meet 4. I'm not qualified, next." (Application never sent.)
"The 3 core must-haves? I've got all 3. The other 4 are 'preferred' and 'an asset.' That's a strong fit — I'm applying."
The confidence gap is real — and it's costing you
Here's the quiet trap: plenty of people scan a list, hit one bullet they don't have, and close the tab. Others see the same list, shrug at the gaps, and apply anyway. The second group isn't more qualified. They just don't treat "preferred" as "required." The bar you're holding yourself to is often higher than the one the employer set.
You do not need permission to be in the room. If you meet the core requirements, you are a legitimate candidate — even with gaps, even if someone "more qualified" might also apply. Let the hiring team decide who's the best fit. That's literally their job, not yours to pre-decide for them by not applying.
Apply like you belong — because you do
When you do apply with a gap or two, don't apologize for it and don't hide it. Name the core fit plainly and, if it helps, nod once at the gap as something you're ready to close. Confidence here is just accuracy stated out loud.
"I bring [core skill 1] and [core skill 2], which I see are central to this role — I've used both to [one specific result]. I haven't worked in [nice-to-have] yet, but I pick up tools fast and would be glad to ramp up quickly."
Notice what that does: it leads with the core fit, shows impact rather than just activity, and treats the gap as a small, closable thing — not a confession. That's how a qualified person talks.
A quick gut-check before you skip a posting
- Do I meet the 2–4 core requirements? If yes, that's your green light.
- Are my "missing" items actually labelled preferred, bonus, an asset, or nice to have? Those are not blockers.
- Am I rejecting myself before the employer gets the chance? If so, let them do their job.
If you want to sanity-check that a role and its pay are real and in range before you invest the time, Canada's Job Bank lists typical wages (X to Y for most roles) and required skills by occupation — a quick way to confirm you're genuinely in the ballpark.
Open that posting you bookmarked but talked yourself out of. Circle the 2–4 core requirements. If you meet them, apply today — gaps and all. "Core requirements met" is your green light, not a maybe.
Comments